Showing posts with label newspapers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label newspapers. Show all posts

Monday, 9 November 2020

The ghosts of newspaper row

 The reporters would pant up five flights of stairs to reach their dingy, dim newsrooms, where light eked through the dirt-cloaked windows and the green shades over the oil lamps were burned through with holes. They wended through hobbled tables piled high with papers, walked past cubbies so chaotically stuffed with scrolled proofs no outsider could guess the system. The reporters reeked of five-alarm smoke, or had coat pockets bulky with notes and a pistol from the front, or were tipsy from a gala ball, or dusty from a horse race. If they held important news in those notebooks, a copy boy would crowd by their elbow as they wrote, snatch the ink-wet sheets from their hands, and rush them off to the copyholder to “put them into metal.”

The center of news in the nineteenth century lined the streets around City Hall Park, only a short sprint to Wall Street, close to the harbor. News sailed in on the wind. Newspaper schooners cut through the waves and fog to land their men onboard the arriving European steamers before the less affluent New York newspapers could get out there with their rowboats.


Amid recent renovations on Park Row, construction workers discovered artifacts of news reporters inside the walls—papers and typewriters. Who knows what ghosts might lurk there still?


“Journalism is the real Minotaur,” nineteenth-century reporter Stephen Fiske remarked, looking back on his career. “It demands every year a fresh supply of young men and women: devours them, destroys them, and is ready for another batch of tender victims from colleges or country towns.” He had begun as a columnist at age twelve. Other reporters jumped in audaciously in their twenties, such as Henry Villard, a German immigrant who rapidly taught himself English so as to cover the Lincoln–Douglas debates.


They were almost entirely anonymous. Inherited British etiquette dictated that to claim a byline would be immodest. It would risk encouraging flamboyance, even spark recklessness. Instead, they represented their team: the New York Times, the New-York Tribune, the New York Herald, and on. Like a priest of the same era forbidden to use I, reporters denied themselves the honor of possessing their writing. They seeded their identity into the words themselves.


NEWSBOYS AND NEWSGIRLS ON NEWSPAPER ROW, PARK ROW, NYC. PHOTO BY LEWIS WICKS HINE FROM LIBRARY OF CONGRESS


They wrote well to impress the reporter seated next to them, or rivals at the other papers. They strove to create in words the moving image of an event or the quirks of an important person. Photographic evidence was scant at that time. Reporters needed to be the eyes for those too far away to see. They wrote well to lasso in the readers who constantly strayed. Three-quarters of a newspaper’s customers faded away each year, and newspapers needed to lure fresh ones.


The reporters wrote fast. They fed the street-level, steam-driven presses that each inked some fifty miles of paper each day. They wrote to feed the conveyor belt of hooks that ran along the ceiling, from the editor to the foreman to the typographer. Stories hung like cow carcasses headed to butchery. “The fevered pencil flies, every nerve is strained, every brain-cell is clear,” wrote one reporter of that time. “Comment, description, reminiscence, dialogue, and explanation flow upon the impatient sheets in short paragraphs, like slivers of crystal,” wrote Julian Ralph, a British reporter who worked in New York City, in 1893.


They focused even amid the clicking of the telegraph, the shouting of the editors, the joking of the office boy, and the copy cutters pressing their deadlines. The only relief came when the Associated Press marked the final delivery of the day’s breaking news. “Over the wires and at the end of the last sheet of flimsy has come the welcome message, ‘Good-night,’ ” one editor, Melville Philips, recalled.


The reporters mixed among the rich for sources or dared to knock at the most squalid crime dens. They heard out their critics; one tall, thin writer bent like a hook to politely listen to the manager of the theater whose production he had unflatteringly dissected, begged repetition (indicating bad hearing), and then, having failed to make out the tirade a second time, asked again and again, until wrath had withered.


They competed to file. News lay out in distant towns and the reporter would pluck it like a giant’s eye and race back with the prize to send over the closest telegraph. Julian Ralph remembered competing with a Tribune man when out on assignment. “We had to run three miles over a plain that was one great glare of ice. He was the faster runner and appeared to have everything his own way, but suddenly he slipped and rolled down the side of a gully to fetch up at the bottom badly hurt. The tearing of his clothes and peeling of his face did not bother him, but his ankle was sprained and he could not walk without help. ‘I give up,’ said he. ‘Will you help me to the village?’ ‘I don’t know,” I replied. “Is the wire mine?’ ”


Though readers rarely knew who wrote what, the reporters knew each other well. Journalists scuffled in the streets, smacked each other with canes. They celebrated in private gathering spots. A few might be sufficiently bohemian enough to share a beer at Pfaff’s on Broadway near Bleecker with Walt Whitman, the former editor of the Brooklyn Eagle, or have angled into respectability at the Lotos Club. But they more likely visited the Bread and Cheese Club on Broadway and Reade Streets or the Sketch Club.


They understood how to dowse for a story, to identify the vibrating image that could stir emotion. A reporter remembered a day with nothing but fourth-rate news unfolding, when he scanned every line of the afternoon paper with the managing editor, hunting for the next day’s feature. The managing editor yelled out, “I have it!” A tiny baby girl had been found buried in Harlem. “The only uncommon item was that the infant was richly dressed.”


The managing editor gave the orders: “See the place where the baby was found, the policeman who found it; follow it to Matron Webb’s room in the police headquarters, where all foundlings are first taken, and get a long full account from the matron of … the most remarkable, the strangest, most pathetic, moving or stirring experiences she has had… Then … go to the asylum where these babies are brought up, and to the Potter’s Field where they are buried.”


William Cullen Bryant, editor at the Evening Post and a poet, hung on the newsroom wall his “Index Expurgatorious” for writers, his commandments for striking out words that failed to chime the way others could: “Jeapordize should not be used.” “Gratuitous means ‘without payment.’ ” “Jewelry for jewels.” Don’t use “bulls and bears” for Wall Street.


They sacrificed human comforts, like Gerald Hallock who stayed in the city to run the Journal of Commerce while his family lived in New Haven. He collapsed onto a cot in the office each night, took lonely dinners in restaurants, and “slept on his arms,” the image of a man devoted to his desk. When reporting a fire, he fell into a newly dug cellar in the dark streets. “I sat down on the curbstone to rub myself, and, seeing the light of the fire brighten up, I started for it,” he told a friend.


Julian Ralph remembers the wealthiest man in the country, baffled, observing to him after an interview: “You mastered the intricacies of financial matters in hours and yet you persist in this profession with no pecuniary gain unless one’s aim is to run a paper?” Ralph had no satisfactory answer. His desire to use his intellect to fill newspaper columns was inexplicable except as a relationship with fellow journalists and the dead ones.


Because of their anonymous voices, we know about the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, and Lincoln’s sorrows, and the draft riots, when violent white mobs beat passersby, lynched and mutilated Black people, and torched homes. The anonymous journalists reported those incidents including peculiar details, such as expensive pianos smashed with pickaxes, mirrors shattered by stones. “One fellow appeared at a window with a picture of the President, spat on it, split it over his knee and hurled it into the street, where it was quickly trampled into atoms. Then, in a half a dozen places at once, the flames burst forth. So rapidly did they spread that some of the plunderers in the house had to escape from the windows by means of ladders.”


They covered the heat wave of 1896 during which fifteen hundred New Yorkers perished. “The spot that was perhaps hottest of all was the glaring asphalted pass in front of the City Hall. A man threw up his hands and fell there shortly before noon. A thermometer on the steps at the time held mercury that was at the 112-degree mark.”


Or those that survived: “The close structure of the lower part of the Third Avenue Elevated Railroad was a boon to the east side all day. Under it was real shade and were it not for the humidity the shelter would have been perfect. Hundreds of boys sat along the curbs, too listless for play or mischief. Men came out of the broiling sun above Canal Street or below the City Hall and stopped to rest and breathe beneath the rumbling trains.”


They climbed the inner scaffolding of the Statue of Liberty before it was clad with copper, describing the experience in the third person. “He looked downward, and the earth seemed further than the sky. The rounds of the ladders had disappeared and there seemed to be nothing by which to descend but the iron beams of the framework. The swaying of the treetops beneath unnerved him as much as the sweeping movement of the long arm above… Just as he got to the forearm a triumphant shout reached his ears. The [cartoon] artist had both his hands clasped on Liberty’s wrist and was ‘feeling her pulse.’ He was the first that ever burst into that dizzy spot except the workmen. No such glorious view of New York bay was ever obtained before. The air was clear and there was no limit upon the human sight except human frailty. Great ships looked like sloops, schooners like sailboats, men like moving sticks. Even the Brooklyn Bridge seemed a thing of the earth’s surface, which could be touched with the hand by any one sailing under it.”


All writers contribute to humanity’s intellectual compost, nourishing future ideas, but few do so more plainly than those anonymous writers. As Edward G. P. Wilkins wrote about one of his gifted colleagues, “his writings are buried in the files of ‘The Herald,’ ‘The Saturday Press,’ and ‘the Leader,’ and they are buried forever.” Those reporters did not cherish the silly illusion that their names would echo through the ages. They skipped the stage of “I’ve never heard of him” to immediately become what might be valued forever: their words.


In the Cypress Hill Cemetery in Queens, on a hilltop at the “brow of a small hill, commanding a beautiful view of the country for many miles around, with Jamaica Bay and ocean in the distance,” is a graveyard, acquired in 1871 by the New York Press Club, originally for 360 graves for “friendless journalists.” The space was intended for newspaper people who “die in the city without means or inclination to be buried elsewhere.” At an 1887 ceremony, thousands gathered to dedicate a thirty-eight-foot obelisk inscribed NEW YORK PRESS BURIAL PLOT. Under sunny skies, Chauncey Depew, the railroad president and sought-after orator, honored the fallen: “The reporter, with no incentive but his duty, outdoes the soldier, and telegraphs to his paper an account that electrifies the world, but bears no signature.”


An 1866 obituary for a newspaperman expressed the writer’s fervent hope of what such people might earn in the afterlife: “There he shall be able to see the immense masses of mind he has moved, all unknowing and unknown as he has been, during his weary pilgrimage on earth. There he will find all articles credited—not a clap of his thunder stolen; and there shall be no horrid typographical errors to set him in a fever.”


(Source: The Paris Review)

Sunday, 2 August 2020

Sunday, 22 March 2020

Self-Isolation to check Coronavirus in Qatar

My latest on self-isolation to check Coronavirus in Qatar in Today's Kannada Prabha supplement - Bhanuprabha. Here's the link:



Sunday, 5 January 2020

Sunday, 8 December 2019

So Souq

My latest on Doha Souq Waqif in today's Deccan Herald newspaper. Here's the link:


Sunday, 20 October 2019

Some lessons in Astro Photography

Here's my latest on shooting Milkyway and some lessons in Astro Photography in today's Kannada Prabha newspaper. Here's the link: 



Saturday, 18 May 2019

Robes of Buddhist monks

My latest on the robes of the Buddhist monks on the occasion of Buddha Purnima in today's Kannada Prabha newspaper. Here's the link:



Saturday, 16 March 2019

A mom created a children's newspaper to improve her son's GK

Despite good academics, most job applicants have very poor GK. When Nidhi Arora noticed this and saw the sheer lack of children's newspapers, she decided to make one herself.

When IIM graduate and consulting firm director Nidhi Arora sat on various recruitment interviews for organisations and colleges for over a decade, she noticed a consistent pattern -- two out of three candidates were rejected, and this was because they did not read the newspaper.

"The talent that was walking in that interview room door was awesome -- above 95 per cent in academics throughout, studied from IIT or an equally prestigious institution, done very well in the preliminary or entrance exam etc," explains Nidhi in an interview with India Today Education.

Nidhi Arora noticed there was no daily children's newspaper. So she created 'The Children's Post' for her son (pictured here).

Yet, the problem was that most candidates couldn't discuss current affairs.

"Most of them did not read current affairs at all, and a few depended on online news or TV for their current affairs and ended up reproducing the same things that they had read or heard. There was no analysis and no depth to their answers," she said.
Understanding what is going around the world is vital for the growth of children because it gives them a clear perspective of what they need to do in life - what does the world need? Is there any technology that could help save the environment? Could I create something to do that? -- such questions can form in a child's mind only when he or she clearly understand the crucial world issues around them.

"The candidates who were able to clear the interviews had read about current affairs, knew their numbers, and were able to present both sides of the story," says Nidhi.

"When we asked them where they went for their current affairs, every single one of them said that they read a detailed story in a newspaper, and supplemented it with TV debates or online news," she added.

Observing this issue for over 14 years of her professional life, Nidhi Arora realised that even after a child has excelled academically and done everything right, when it came to that last step, "how you view the world makes all the difference".

This awareness sets apart candidates sitting for job interviews - some have a clear idea of what is going on around them and can even give their own opinion on the same, and these kids grow up to be real changemakers.

So, the solution to this sounds simple -- ensure children have access to a good newspaper. However, this turned out to be the second problem.

The seven main editors of 'The Children's Post'. Nidhi Arora is in the centre with one of the editors on video call.
Lack of children's newspapers in India
The Aroras get four newspapers every single morning at home - in two languages -- but the language is complex and none could be given to a child of seven or eight years of age.

"When my son turned eight, I started looking for a daily newspaper for him. I looked, and looked, and looked -- for a year. When he turned nine, I decided he will either form the habit now, or never. So in June 2017, I made a sample 4-page paper at home," says Nidhi.

Thus, 'The Children's Post' was born out of encouragement from a group of mothers on Facebook -- Gurgaon Moms.

"When my son got the paper, he vanished into his room. When he came out about 20 minutes later, he said, 'Mom, if you think you know how happy I am, you know nothing,'" says Nidhi.
How did 'The Children's Post' become popular?
Once this unique paper was launched, everyone who heard about it loved it! Right now, it is the only daily newspaper in India for children.

"The response since releasing it is so empowering, supportive and awesome," gushes Nidhi.

The Children's Post is a 4-page print-at-home e-paper. Parents and educational institutes get the e-paper version of the children's newspaper, which can then be printed on A4 sheets for children.
"Yashoda Hospital, Ghaziabad, shares it with everyone in their pediatric ward and the OPD for children. MGM in Aurangabad is also introducing it to classes in their schools. We share it with NGOs who work with children at no cost," says Nidhi.

"The target age is 8 to 13 years. I am aware that children much older than that are enjoying the paper and ask for it every day. That kind of feedback makes our day," she adds.


The paper has news on every conceivable topic -- international affairs, environment, economics, internet security, ecology, history, gadgets and technology, knowledge about the Indian democratic system and how to be a responsible citizen of India.

It also includes puzzles, quizzes, poetry, short stories, cartoons, and even in-paper courses.

"Our USP, I think, is the sheer volume of child-generated content that we have - around 40 per cent. All our cartoonists are children. They generate one comic strip a week! There is poetry, phonics, stories, mazes, quizzes -- you name it and it's there," says Nidhi.

A screenshot from the November 18 issue of 'The Children's Post'
How is the children's newspaper created every day?
"Our delivery and creation model is designed to ensure that the child comes first -- every edition of the paper is made by a parent keeping in mind the needs of their own child. Each parent-editor puts in 5-6 hours a week to curate content for The Children's Post," says Nidhi.

Quite a few editors are involved in the making of the paper apart from Nidhi Arora. They include -- Aditi Hingu, Shalaka, Neha, Munmun, Monica, Pradeepthi Visamsetty, Deepti Chhabra, Bhavneet Arora, Harinder, Shivani, and Ekta.

The parent-editor of the day decides the content -- s/he can pick up any number of articles from the pile of contributed content, while the rest of the stories are written by him/her.
The completed copy then reaches Nidhi and Ekta for the second round of editing. They ensure grammar and facts are correct and ensure that the written language is simple enough to engage kids and doesn't violate any of the basic tenets of the children's newspaper.

Ekta sits up for a couple of hours every night to review the paper, while Nidhi is the second reviewing editor.

"Every edition is that editor's baby. Usually, we ask the readers what they want to read more of, and change accordingly," says Nidhi.


Challenges encountered in making the children's newspaper
Two primary challenges came up while helping the children's newspaper grow.

"They all enjoy the paper, they send in contributions, but feedback? We literally have to plead! So we use Facebook polls, posts, questions," explains Nidhi.
The second challenge is spreading awareness about the paper. "I truly believe that the work we are doing is vital for children in India today. There is nothing like this available to our children, and that has an impact on their future. We really don't know how to make more children and parents aware of this," she says.

Pradeepthi Vissamsetti, one of the editors of 'The Children's Post' preparing a copy of the children's newspaper.
What is the print-at-home newspaper model like?
The Children's Post is not an e-paper but a print-at-home children's newspaper.

"A4 sheets can be easily printed on any home or office printer. In my house, we have printed the paper every single day since June 30, 2017, and we recommend the same to other parents. The model of print-at-home content is new and unexplored, but we believe it is the future since delivery costs are rising and printing costs are falling," says Nidhi.

Every morning, the e-paper version of the day reached email-ids and Whatsapp inboxes from where it can be printed into a hard copy for the kids.

"Our advantage is that A4 size is perfect for the small hands of our readers and they love holding the paper in their hands," she adds.

But how will a children's newspaper help in today's digital world of GK apps?
The sheer number of apps available to make learning of children fun and engaging can almost be confusing sometimes. In such a time, creating a children's newspaper might seem irrelevant, but it is precisely because of the technology influx that reading a newspaper can help.

Too much of screen time can affect the brains of children in adverse ways.
"It is my belief that a non-reflective surface like paper will send fewer stimuli to your brain and you'll be able to focus. Screens, even if you're reading only one thing, are stimulating your brain all the time, literally programming your brain to look for a new stimulus every few seconds. I have found myself getting distracted lately when trying to read a book. This never used to happen earlier," explains Nidhi.

She adds that she prefers not depending on TV or online websites for news -- "TV is pure cacophony and online is full of fake news and one sided propaganda items."

Yet another problem with reading news online is once you open one website or app for your child, it's only a matter of time before s/he goes to other, less verified sources. "You won't be able to control that," Nidhi says.


The third issue she points out is how children can become easily blocked in as per their own interest areas.

"When you go online, you choose the kind of news you want to read and stick to your comfort zone. But a newspaper is like a digest. You may not read everything, but your horizon and frame of reference are expanding. You are becoming capable of discussing more topics, without even realising it," Nidhi explains.

The last reason that sets The Children's Post a notch above GK apps is its curated content "that speaks in the language of the child, helps them make sense of the world, truly understand fundamental concepts, and not just spew jargon."

How can you get a copy of the 'The Children's Post'?
The children's newspaper can be found online to print or download here. You can opt for their monthly subscription as well.

There is a Whatsapp group for parents where the pdf of the print-at-home paper is sent -- no interaction takes place here and they are reserved for the Facebook group.

To join the Facebook group where feedback, discussion and richer interaction is encouraged, the parent needs to mention the age of the child and their interest in the paper.

"Institutional subscribers get a copy in their email inbox. They can take a printout and keep it outside the library or read out in the assembly. We have seen both models work," says Nidhi.

Nidhi Arora with her husband and child.
Are there plans to make 'The Children's Post' bigger?
"Oh yes! Being the only daily newspaper in India made exclusively for kids, the Children's Post should be a staple in every house which has a child above the age of eight. When you read a few sample copies, you see that this is, in fact, a door to a magical kingdom," says Nidhi.

"We currently have about 3000 readers, but we would like to take The Children's Post to every child all over the country who can enjoy it," she adds.

So how does a working mother manage to give time to this project?

"I just do. It's easy to stay the course when you see your child transform," Nidhi smiles.

(Source: India Today)

Saturday, 16 February 2019

What Che Guevara and Fidel Castro Read

Even Che Guevara, the poster boy for the Cuban Revolution, was forced to admit that endlessly trudging the Sierra Maestra mountains had its downsides. “There are periods of boredom in the life of the guerrilla fighter,” he warns future revolutionaries in his classic handbook, Guerrilla Warfare. The best way to combat the dangers of ennui, he helpfully suggests, is reading. Many of the rebels were college educated—Che was a doctor, Fidel a lawyer, others fine art majors—and visitors to the rebels’ jungle camps were often struck by their literary leanings. Even the most macho fighters, it seems, would be seen hunched over books.

Che recommends that guerrillas carry edifying works of nonfiction despite their annoying weight—“good biographies of past heroes, histories, or economic geographies” will distract them from vices such as gambling and drinking. An early favorite in camp, improbably, was a Spanish-language Reader’s Digest book on great men in U.S. history, which the visiting CBS-TV journalist Robert Taber noticed in 1957 was passed around from man to man, possibly for his benefit. But literary fiction had its place, especially if it fit vaguely into the revolutionary framework.

One big hit was Curzio Malaparte’s The Skin, a novel recounting the brutality of the occupation of Naples after World War II. (Ever convinced of victory, Fidel thought reading the book would help ensure that the men would behave well when they captured Havana.) More improbably, a dog-eared copy of Émile Zola’s psychological thriller The Beast Within was also pored over with an intensity that could only impress modern bibliophiles.

Raúl Castro, Fidel’s younger brother and usually an inspired platoon leader, recalled in his diary that he was lost in “the first dialogue of Séverine with the Secretary General of Justice” while waiting in ambush one morning when he was startled by the first shots of battle at 8:05 A.M. Che himself was nearly killed in an air raid because he was engrossed in Edward Gibbon’s The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.

CHE GUEVARA READING THE NEWSPAPER LA NACIÓN.
PHOTO: DIARIO LA NACIÓN. PUBLIC DOMAIN, VIA WIKIMEDIA COMMONS.

Hours at night could also be whiled away listening to stories. Two rustic poets even took to holding the guerrilla version of poetry slams. A peasant named José de la Cruz, “Crucito,” declared himself “the mountain nightingale” and composed epic ballads in ten-verse guajira (mountain peasant) stanzas about the adventures of the guerrilla troupe. Like a Homer of the jungle, he sat with his pipe by the campfire and spouted comic lyrics, while denouncing his rival, Calixto Morales, as “the buzzard of the plains.” Tragically, the oral tradition was lost to posterity when the troubadour Crucito was killed later in the war. There had not been enough spare paper to record his verse.

But the most beguiling snippet of literary trivia from the Cuban Revolution is Fidel’s assertion during an interview with the Spanish journalist Ignacio Ramonet that he studied Ernest Hemingway’s 1940 classic For Whom the Bell Tolls for tips on guerrilla warfare. Papa’s novel, Fidel said, allowed him and his men “to actually see that experience … as an irregular struggle, from the political and military point of view.” He added: “That book became a familiar part of my life. And we always went back to it, consulted it, to find inspiration.”

“Ernesto,” as the famous American expatriate was fondly known in Cuba at the time, had written the novel based on his experience as a newspaper correspondent in the Spanish Civil War in 1937, and its pages are filled with vivid descriptions of irregular combat behind enemy lines. He had hammered out the manuscript on a Remington typewriter in room 511 of the colonial Ambos Mundos Hotel in Old Havana, never imagining that a similar war would begin in his adopted home. Although it was released when Fidel and his compañeros were still children, they grew up very aware of the best seller (in translation as Por quién doblan las campanas), not to mention the Hollywood version starring Gary Cooper and Ingrid Bergman. Fidel first read it as a student; he says he reread it at least twice in the Sierra Maestra.

When it comes to specific guerrilla tactics—the art of ambush, for example, or how to manage supply lines—For Whom the Bell Tolls doesn’t offer much specific insight. There are a few straightforward ideas about, say, attaching strings to grenade pins so they can be detonated from a distance, or descriptions of the ideal partisan hideout. But more importantly, the novel is a perceptive handbook on the psychological element of irregular warfare. The hero, Robert Jordan, is forced to navigate an intricate and alien world, filled with exotic personalities and possible betrayals, much as Fidel’s men did in the Sierra Maestra.

Translated to their tropical setting, there are many parallels between the novel and the rebel army’s situation, from the importance of keeping a positive attitude among the troops to Robert Jordan’s rules for getting along in Latin culture: “give the men tobacco and leave the women alone,” mirroring Fidel’s unbreakable rule that village girls never be molested, and the main guerrilla organizer Celia Sánchez’s dogged efforts to keep the men supplied with decent cigars. (Of course, it’s a rule that Robert Jordan breaks in the novel. His torrid affair with the alluring Maria includes a detailed forest romp that can only have impressed the affection-starved guerrillas.)

Although Hemingway surely would have been flattered that the Cuban rebels were reading his work, he was surprisingly silent about the revolution in his adopted homeland. His fishing-boat captain, Gregorio Fuentes, boasted afterward that he and Ernesto had smuggled guns for Fidel in Hemingway’s boat Pilar, but this appears to have been a tall tale concocted for tourists. In private, Hemingway was disparaging about Cuba’s authoritarian ruler, Fulgencio Batista, and in one letter called him a “son-of-a-bitch.” But Hemingway’s only public protest came when he donated his Nobel Prize medal to the Cuban people: rather than let a government body display it, he left it in the Virgen del Cobre cathedral for safekeeping. (It is still there, in a glass wall case).

Even Batista’s own intelligence service found it hard to believe that Ernesto was neutral, and several times, soldiers searched his Havana mansion, known as La Finca de Vigía, for weapons while he was away traveling. On one occasion, the intruders were attacked by Hemingway’s favorite dog, an Alaskan springer spaniel named Black; they bludgeoned him to death with rifle butts in front of horrified servants. Black was buried in the garden “pet cemetery” by the swimming pool, where he had lolled at his master’s feet for many years. When he returned to Havana, Hemingway stormed in outrage to the local police office to file a report, ignoring the warnings of Cuban friends. A local might have been given a beating, but Hemingway’s celebrity protected him—though, needless to say, no investigation ever resulted. (Black’s grave, incidentally, is still there at the Finca, though no explanation is offered to the steady stream of fans who visit the house.)

During the “honeymoon period” of 1959, when the entire world was enchanted by Fidel’s romantic victory, “Hem” was visited by a string of literary luminaries who wanted to see the revolution firsthand—including, on one occasion, the young founding editor of The Paris Review, George Plimpton. Hemingway and Plimpton were knocking back daiquiris one afternoon at Hemingway’s favorite Havana bar, El Floridita, with the playwright Tennessee Williams and the English critic Kenneth Tynan, when they ran into the officer who was overseeing the executions of Batista’s most sinister henchmen.

Plimpton and Williams both guiltily accepted an invitation to attend a firing squad that same night—a morbid, voyeuristic urge that Hemingway heartily encouraged, since, as Plimpton later recalled, “it was important that a writer get around to just about anything, especially the excesses of human behavior, as long as he could keep his emotional reactions in check.”

As it happens, the execution was delayed and the pair never made their macabre rendezvous—a loss for literature that is surely incalculable.

(Source: The Paris Review)

Friday, 8 February 2019

The byline is dead

How Indian newsrooms became morgues for investigative journalism

The word “byline” first appeared about a century ago in Ernest Hemingway’s novel The Sun Also Rises. Over time, for idealists among us, the byline came to represent the power of journalism—the courage it provided an ordinary reporter to challenge the high and mighty. As a young journalist, this was the sort of byline I aspired for, whose sanctity, I believed, was to be doggedly protected by editors. Over my career, I have watched the byline die a slow and violent death. It has been killed not only by power-hungry politicians and corporate barons, but also by media owners and their servile editors.

More than a decade ago, I opened a folder in my email called “Morgue.” I began saving in it stories I had written that met journalistic standards but still failed to see the light of the day. Stories have continued to pile up in that folder even as I have changed jobs—from working for a big start-up newspaper, to a giant media house known for its crass profit hunt, to a media house with great moral reputation. In the mortuary of these dead stories, I have a collection of reporting on some of our biggest political leaders and corporate giants that, in a country with a robust media, would have been celebrated, and in a law-abiding society, would have triggered major criminal investigations. But in India, these stories have found few takers. There have been times when I have seen individual editors stand up for journalism, but they have been rare exceptions. The culture of the newsroom has degenerated slowly, and self-censorship has become second nature to young journalists.

More than a decade ago, I opened a folder in my email called “Morgue.” I began saving in it stories I had written that met journalistic standards but still failed to see the light of the day. Stories have continued to pile up in that folder even as I have changed jobs.
I became acquainted with the realities of the newsroom within a few years of starting my career. One evening about a decade ago, I received a call from a promoter of the newspaper I was working for. A member of my team had dug up a sensational story about a mysterious fire that had destroyed income-tax files pertaining to a large fine imposed upon a major real-estate company. The promoter asked me to hold the story for a couple of days, because someone from that company had reached out to him to provide their version. Two days later, the newspaper was wrapped in a jacket advertisement of the tax-evading real estate firm. The story never appeared in the newspaper.

Over the past few decades, Indian media is increasingly being driven by profits, and has all but abandoned its role as the fourth pillar of democracy. In this landscape, far from being appreciated, good reporting is actively censored. Editors play brokers, trying to balance various interests while maintaining a veneer of professionalism. And owners have pawned their brands for political and commercial glory. The fastest promotions and the fattest salary packages are reserved mostly for middlemen, who masquerade as journalists but primarily fix deals and manage the sundry troublemakers for the media baron—politicians, tax authorities and the police, among others.

The word “byline” first appeared about a century ago in Ernest Hemingway’s novel The Sun Also Rises. Over time, for idealists among us, the byline came to represent the power of journalism—the courage it provided an ordinary reporter to challenge the high and mighty. As a young journalist, this was the sort of byline I aspired for, whose sanctity, I believed, was to be doggedly protected by editors. Over my career, I have watched the byline die a slow and violent death. It has been killed not only by power-hungry politicians and corporate barons, but also by media owners and their servile editors.

More than a decade ago, I opened a folder in my email called “Morgue.” I began saving in it stories I had written that met journalistic standards but still failed to see the light of the day. Stories have continued to pile up in that folder even as I have changed jobs—from working for a big start-up newspaper, to a giant media house known for its crass profit hunt, to a media house with great moral reputation. In the mortuary of these dead stories, I have a collection of reporting on some of our biggest political leaders and corporate giants that, in a country with a robust media, would have been celebrated, and in a law-abiding society, would have triggered major criminal investigations. But in India, these stories have found few takers. There have been times when I have seen individual editors stand up for journalism, but they have been rare exceptions. The culture of the newsroom has degenerated slowly, and self-censorship has become second nature to young journalists.


More than a decade ago, I opened a folder in my email called “Morgue.” I began saving in it stories I had written that met journalistic standards but still failed to see the light of the day. Stories have continued to pile up in that folder even as I have changed jobs.
I became acquainted with the realities of the newsroom within a few years of starting my career. One evening about a decade ago, I received a call from a promoter of the newspaper I was working for. A member of my team had dug up a sensational story about a mysterious fire that had destroyed income-tax files pertaining to a large fine imposed upon a major real-estate company. The promoter asked me to hold the story for a couple of days, because someone from that company had reached out to him to provide their version. Two days later, the newspaper was wrapped in a jacket advertisement of the tax-evading real estate firm. The story never appeared in the newspaper.

Over the past few decades, Indian media is increasingly being driven by profits, and has all but abandoned its role as the fourth pillar of democracy. In this landscape, far from being appreciated, good reporting is actively censored. Editors play brokers, trying to balance various interests while maintaining a veneer of professionalism. And owners have pawned their brands for political and commercial glory. The fastest promotions and the fattest salary packages are reserved mostly for middlemen, who masquerade as journalists but primarily fix deals and manage the sundry troublemakers for the media baron—politicians, tax authorities and the police, among others.

The worst effect has been on reporters who have been baptised into this profession in these miserable times. A reporter’s job today is to find enough material to fill up the pages. Taught to self-censor at every step, she would not even dare pitch a story that might endanger her safe existence in a prestigious newsroom.

Thus, most reporters simply report on stories coming out in the newswires, which churn out public-relations material for the establishment. The reporters mildly modify these stories, insert their names, and file their drafts. The editors are, in turn, happy that there is no difficult copy to edit, no corporate giant to pacify, no government bullies to be dealt with. These phony bylines are all these reporters can hope for in big newsrooms.

As a result, most newspapers look and read identical to each other. Most front pages are dominated by celebratory messages about the government’s programmes. When the high and mighty are fighting—as in the recent cases of disputes within the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Reserve Bank of India—leaks start appearing in the newspapers. The rest of the daily carries corporate announcements, a few offbeat human-interest stories, and some data-based articles. There is no investigative journalism.

While these processes were set in motion long back, the present government’s defanging of the media remains unprecedented. Narendra Modi was the first politician to spot the huge potential of social media. On these platforms, Modi and his government are free to put out information that would not have survived journalistic scrutiny, and unleash their army of trolls on anyone who tries to hold them accountable.

In fact, the establishment’s social media has become the primary source of information for even reporters. On most days, tweets from Modi or a government minister are lead stories for newspapers. Reporters spend their time scouring social media, as they are mostly frozen out from the government’s inner workings.

Modi seems equally adept at managing traditional media. Ever since he first started roaming the television studios in the early 1990s, Modi has refused to leave the frame.

The national bureaus of most newspapers are overrun with reporters who aim for access instead of journalism. Even some fellow journalists, who would congratulate us on good stories before the 2014 elections, and whose eloquence about investigative journalism felt sincere then, are now bending over backwards for the government to secure their salaries, reduced to court jesters and crude propagandists. After a few exemplary sackings of editors who questioned this state of affairs, there is no dissent in big newsrooms.

This atmosphere of self-preservation and fear has extended beyond the media as well. In this attempt to convert us into an illiberal democracy, every institution is under attack. A key ingredient in great reporting has always been the whistle-blower. But in India, whistle-blowing can land you in jail, probably get you killed, and open you up to ideology-drunk, trigger-happy social-media armies. Governments over the years, with clever bureaucratic advice, have watered down whatever protection was available to whistle-blowers. The credibility of the office of the Central Vigilance Commission—a body created to address corruption in the higher levels of government—is itself in doubt. The Prevention of Corruption Act was modified earlier this year, narrowing down the definition of “criminal misconduct,” and making new sanctions necessary to prosecute government officials. The government has been hostile to the Right to Information Act, refusing to appoint information commissioners and looking for ways to dilute the Act itself.

It is now hard to find officials such as those who played a key role in passing on documents about the UPA government’s scandals, and even harder to make them talk. Fear of those in power has been injected into every vein of governance. Under the present government’s watchful eyes, even when one manages to meet old contacts, their behaviour seems bizarre. In their own office space, they glance at the walls as if they have ears. In coffee shops, they scan their surroundings to see if any spooks are around. On the phone, they prefer encrypted messaging systems. In public, they profusely praise those in power. Interactions with senior officials, who once upon a time readily parted with information, have now become absurd. One sends around videos of himself singing karaoke to suggestive songs, another prefers to discuss profound international books, while a third, who used to be seen chatting up journalists in Delhi’s Khan Market during the previous government, is now nowhere to be found. It is only when they are dead sure no one is listening that they can be seen frothing about the government’s many failures.

The establishment’s social media has become the primary source of information for reporters. On most days, tweets from Modi or a government minister are lead stories for newspapers. Reporters spend their time scouring social media, as they are mostly frozen out from the government’s inner workings.

Anyone who started reporting in recent years has only known this side of reporting—bureaucrats who will not meet, sources who are unavailable, and a one-way flow of information. A generation of reporters has not even had the chance to learn how government and corporate reporting works. The list of those silently suffering is endless—freelancers without legal support to fight cases, small-town reporters who are murdered for taking on the local mafia, senior reporters in metros who have surrendered their idealism for the sake of a monthly salary.

Not all the stories in my “Morgue” folder have gone unread. Some of the stories from my folder, besides a lot of fresh reporting, found their way into my 2016 book, A Feast of Vultures: The Hidden Business of Democracy in India. A major media house wanted to carry exclusive extracts from it. After sitting on the material for a month, they told my publishers they did not want to take on any of the corporates named in it. Most mainstream media ignored the book.

In June 2016, a leading English magazine carried an extract from my book, which had mentioned alleged criminal links of the Jet Airways promoter Naresh Goyal. Jet Airways slapped a defamation case against the magazine and me, seeking Rs 1,000 crore in damages. The editor of the magazine was sacked soon after the case was filed. The new editor filed the magazine’s response in court, offering to publish any rejoinder that Jet would provide if it withdrew the case. The new editor did not even care to share the response with me, and ordered his colleagues not to communicate with me. The trial is yet to begin.

This cocktail of sycophancy and propaganda being passed for journalism angers a new generation of young journalists. They have been brought up in newsrooms completely devoid of journalistic integrity and dissent. Soon, when the anger of these reporters boils over, a new byline will arise.

(Source: The Caravan)

Friday, 28 December 2018

Satire and the Malayali: Why India’s best cartoonists almost always come from Kerala

Political cartooning and Kerala have been a perfect match since the first cartoon was published in the state in 1919.

A fearsome god-like figure in the middle of the frame appears to be presiding over a scene of death, starvation and torture. Impaled on a spear held in his left hand is a human kill. A terrified creature in his right fist is struggling to escape a similar fate. The only one seemingly unaffected by the grisly goings-on is a smaller figure of authority, clad in western attire – boots, trousers, cape and cap – standing with his hands raised in benediction or approval.

This is a scene from Mahakshamadevatha, or the God of Famine, likely the first-ever cartoon published in Kerala. It appeared in a humour monthly, Vidooshakan (Jester), published from Kollam in October 1919. The work was unsigned.


Bonny Thomas, author and former cartoonist at the Economic Times, stumbled across Mahakshamadevatha in the archives of the State Central Library in Thiruvananthapuram in 1989. Thomas, who was trying to document the rise of cartooning in Kerala at the time, says the work was a powerful statement against war and colonialism. “It was the end of World War I, many parts of Kerala were facing famine because of rice shortages,” he said. “The Travancore king had introduced tapioca cultivation to keep off a crisis – you can see the plant in the margins. The Englishman, likely a policeman or an army man and a representative of colonial powers, is blessing the durdevatha or malevolent god, and the destruction he was causing.”

Mahakshamadevatha, likely the first-ever cartoon published in Kerala.
Mahakshamadevatha was clearly inspired by Punch, the storied British humour and satire magazine. But over the next ten decades, cartooning became as much a part of Kerala as the tapioca that had arrived from Brazil. The state not only produced cartoonists who were star draws in Malayalam newspapers and magazines, but also sent out legends to national and international publications. One such dearly loved export, PKS Kutty, even worked in the Bengali Anandabazar Patrika.

“Almost every newspaper in Kerala has a front-page cartoon and sometimes inside as well,” said seasoned Indian Express cartoonist EP Unny in an article celebrating Kerala’s cartooning centenary in Bhashaposhini, a Malayalam literary journal published by Malayala Manorama. “Even in Europe you will not find the art this prolifically visible every single day. Three crore people, 100% literacy, three in five a newspaper reader, three out of four a voter. And cartoons everywhere.”

Kerala was by no means the first state to take to cartooning. Punch and its sharp caricaturing of British colonialism in India had already inspired the birth of Oudh Punch in 1877 and Parsee Punch in 1854, which served rapier-sharp political wit in Urdu and Parsi Gujarati, respectively. In neighbouring Tamil Nadu, Subramania Bharati, poet, journalist and activist, had introduced cartoons in Indian, the fiercely political journal he started editing in 1906.

But it was in Kerala that cartooning found its natural home.

'The bride isn't enough, they want dowry as well.' Cartoonist Sivaram on reorganisation of erstwhile Andhra Pradesh in 1956 and its demand that it be handed Madras (now Chennai).
Politics and cartooning
The Malayali propensity for satire is ancient and deep-rooted, going as far back as 1500 years. Chakyarkoothu, a jester’s act grounded in the Sanskrit theatre tradition of Koodiyattam, allowed every actor in costume the unfettered freedom to knock down kings, priests and the nobility. In 18th century Kerala, the narrative art of Ottanthullal – a delightful jumble of poetry, dance and music – was scripted by one of the greatest satirists of Malayalam literature, poet Kunjan Nambiar.

Even today, satire saturates the media and entertainment scene. There is the popular “mimics parade”, travelling troupes that specialise in imitating and parodying politicians and celebrities. The nightly political spoofs on practically every news channel show how deeply wired black humour is in the Malayali mindset. The average man or woman on the street has always been argumentative, contrarian and highly political – a god-sent audience for cartooning.

These two cartoons by PK Manthri, which appeared on the same day in humour journal 'Naradan', indicate how the same cartoonist is capable of making a stinging statement about global politics and a banal one about two policewomen fighting in public, says Unny in 'Bhashaposhini'. The first cartoon also indicates the sexism rampant in Kerala's cartooning.
But going back to its growing years, Unny attributes cartooning’s dazzling rise in Kerala to two of its greatest social reformers of the early 20th century – Sree Narayana Guru and Ayyan Kali – who tore down the state’s repressive caste practices. “They gave the common man and the lower castes, who couldn’t even use words like salt in public, the courage to join public conversations,” said Unny. “The teashop became the site of verbal humour, a lot of it political, and that translated easily into the visual humour of cartoons. That is where cartooning in Kerala acquired its intensity.”

Social and cultural historian AR Venkatachalapathy, who has researched the history of cartooning in Tamil Nadu, believes the politically-charged air of Kerala gave its cartooning an edge.

'This Is Delhi', a series by T Samuel, the first pocket cartoonist in India who created Babuji, the predecessor to RK Laxman's Common Man, in 'Times of India'. Babuji was a Delhi character.
“Cartooning requires audacity,” said Venkatachalapathy in an interview to Sahapedia. “You need to have a political vision. The political vision of Tamil cartoonists has never gone beyond accepted middle-class norms…I think Kerala has succeeded because of the strong Left tradition, which gives a theoretical arsenal to criticise. You should have a political vocabulary to criticise, which has been provided by Marxism which essentially a very anti-status quoist ideology.”

Another factor behind cartooning’s rise was the mercurial, binary and combustive nature of politics in Kerala. In the seven years of its democratic existence, the erstwhile Travancore-Cochin state had five chief ministers. After just three years of Left rule, led by EMS Namboodiripad, in the late 1950s, the state of Kerala has largely been led by complex, rocky coalitions helmed either by a fissiparous Congress or the Left. This has guaranteed Malayali cartoonists a perennial wellspring of daily inspiration – factionalism, party hopping, double dealing and scandals that never end. “Neither Kerala’s politicians nor its cartoonists have had any rest since the birth of the state,” quipped Unny in Bhashaposhini.


Early pioneers
Many visionary cartoonists and events, some planned and others purely serendipitous, propelled the unique history of cartooning in Kerala. The 1930s and ’40s saw an explosion of humour magazines in Kerala, such as Sarasan, Vikadakesari, Narmada and Naradan. Between 1935 and 1942, literary critic, lecturer and humourist MR Nair, known by his pen name Sanjayan, started editing two satire weeklies in Kozhikode: Sanjayan and Viswaroopam. These journals, with high standards of writing, nurtured great talents such as PKS Kutty and M Bhaskaran. They also raised “cartoon awareness and readership in Kerala,” Unny said in his chronicling of the state’s cartooning history in Seminar magazine. Sanjayan’s impact was such that “the laid-back port town of Kozhikode in the late 1930s came to acquire subscribers for the Punch magazine in unlikely numbers,” wrote Unny.

Around the same time, another strand of Kerala’s cartooning history was unfurling in Delhi. At the centre of it was a gifted artist from Kayamkulam – Shankar Pillai, the man who was famously commanded by cartoon connoisseur Nehru with the words “Don’t spare me Shankar.” And who went on to obey Nehru by lampooning him in 4,000 cartoons.

Shankar was hired as the first editorial cartoonist of an English newspaper (Hindustan Times) in 1932 by editor Pothen Joseph and remained there till 1947, documenting the nation’s march to freedom and political self-determination.

Shankar Pillai's 'Coconut Ramayana', a pre-Independence cartoon depicting a representation from Kerala requesting viceregal intervention in stopping the import of coconuts from Sri Lanka.


Shankar occupies a huge space in the story of cartooning in Kerala. Not only was he prodigiously talented but he also generously mentored some of the most brilliant talents from the state: OV Vijayan, Abu Abraham, Kutty, T Samuel, Kerala Varma, BM Gafoor and Yesudasan.

At Shankar’s Weekly, which Shankar launched after he quit Hindustan Times, these men got a place to sharpen their skills and polish their styles. Nobody was required there to become Shankar’s clone, says Unny. There was, for instance, Vijayan with his searing honesty, bleak humour and brutal style which, far from giving anyone a good morning laugh, could send them into depression. “It was Vijayan who brought to an end the age of genial cartooning and made savagery his baseline,” said Pritish Nandy in a review of the memoirs of the cartoonist-novelist who contributed to the Far Eastern Economic Review, among other publications. Abu Abraham, who drew for Observer and The Guardian in a London stint, was known for his clean lines and withering wit.

An Abu Abraham cartoon lampoons President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed's signing of the ordinance that ushered in Emergency in 1975.
Something for everyone
While political cartooning remains the mainstay in Malayalam cartooning, the one wildly popular series, adored by children and adults alike, was Bobanum Moliyum (Bob and Molly) that began in 1962. It mapped the little world of two impish children, a small dog at their feet and their adventures in a quintessential Kerala village. It had some staple characters – a mofussil politician, a hippie (named Appi), a harassed mother, a lawyer father – and a gentle humour that landed spot-on nevertheless. Almost every Malayali has a favourite Bobanum Moliyum episode.

Created by cartoonist VT Thomas (better known as Toms) for the Malayala Manorama, it appeared every week on the last page of the magazine, and for devoted fans the last page was always the first page they turned to when the magazine arrived. The children’s antics were of course the heart of the story but alongside, there was a lot of gentle social and political satire in a world where rallies, slogans and village conspiracies were commonplace.




Around the same time, G Aravindan, who was later to become a filmmaker, was pulling in readers into the world of Ramu, a common man observing the world around him, in his cartoon series Cheriya Manushyarum Valiya Lokavum, which appeared in Mathrubhumi from 1961 to 1973.
A cartoon by Aravindan.

The only hole, and a large gaping one, is that this wonderful world of lines has been dominated entirely by men. And the male gaze. The jokes are often sexist and that is no longer funny. “When I go to talk to young school children on cartooning, the girls ask me: do women really look or behave like that? We need to find an answer to that,” said Unny.

(Source: Scroll)

Friday, 21 December 2018

Der Spiegel says top journalist faked stories for years

Publication says Claas Relotius committed journalistic fraud ‘on a grand scale’

The German news magazine Der Spiegel has been plunged into chaos after revealing that one of its top reporters had falsified stories over several years.

The media world was stunned by the revelations that the award-winning journalist Claas Relotius had, according to the weekly, “made up stories and invented protagonists” in at least 14 out of 60 articles that appeared in its print and online editions, warning that other outlets could also be affected.

Relotius, 33, resigned after admitting to the scam. He had written for the magazine for seven years and won numerous awards for his investigative journalism, including CNN Journalist of the Year in 2014.

Earlier this month, he won Germany’s Reporterpreis (Reporter of the Year) for his story about a young Syrian boy, which the jurors praised for its “lightness, poetry and relevance”. It has since emerged that all the sources for his reportage were at best hazy, and much of what he wrote was made up.
The falsification came to light after a colleague who worked with him on a story along the US-Mexican border raised suspicions about some of the details in Relotius’s reporting, having harboured doubts about him for some time.

The colleague, Juan Moreno, eventually tracked down two alleged sources quoted extensively by Relotius in the article, which was published in November. Both said they had never met Relotius. Relotius had also lied about seeing a hand-painted sign that read “Mexicans keep out”, a subsequent investigation found.

Other fraudulent stories included one about a Yemeni prisoner in Guantanamo Bay, and one about the American football star Colin Kaepernick.

In a lengthy article, Spiegel, which sells about 725,000 print copies a month and has an online readership of more than 6.5 million, said it was “shocked” by the discovery and apologised to its readers and to anyone who may have been the subject of “fraudulent quotes, made-up personal details or invented scenes at fictitious places”.

The Hamburg-based magazine, which was founded in 1947 and is renowned for its in-depth investigative pieces, said Relotius had committed journalistic fraud “on a grand scale”. It described the episode as “a low point in Spiegel’s 70-year history”. An in-house commission has been set up to examine all of Relotius’ work for the weekly.

The reporter also wrote for a string of other well-known outlets, including the German newspapers taz, Welt and the Frankfurter Allgemeine’s Sunday edition. Die Welt tweeted on Wednesday: “He abused his talent”.

Relotius told Spiegel he regretted his actions and was deeply ashamed, the magazine said. “I am sick and I need to get help,” he was quoted as saying.

Der Spiegel’s Claas Relotius ‘made up stories and invented protagonists’ Photograph: SKA/HSS/AEDT/WENN.com

Moreno, who has worked for the magazine since 2007, risked his own job when he confronted other colleagues with his suspicions, many of whom did not want to believe him. “For three to four weeks Moreno went through hell because colleagues and those senior to him did not want to believe his accusations at first,” Der Spiegel wrote in an apology to its readers. For several weeks, the magazine said, Relotius was even considered to be the victim of a cunning plot by Moreno.

“Relotius cleverly rebuffed all the attacks, all of Moreno’s well-researched pieces of evidence … until there came a point when that didn’t work any more, until he finally couldn’t sleep any more, hunted by the fear of being discovered,” the magazine wrote.

Relotius, it added, finally gave himself up last week after being confronted by a senior editor.

In his confession to his employer, he said: “It wasn’t because of the next big thing. It was fear of failing. My pressure to not be able to fail got ever bigger the more successful I became.”

The magazine, which is one of Germany’s most prominent news organisations, is now trying to rescue its reputation amid fears a magazine already challenged by the problems in the German newspaper industry will struggle to recover.

“All [his] colleagues are deeply shattered,” the magazine wrote. In particular, it said, in the Society department, where he worked, “[his] colleagues are astounded and sad … the affair feels like a death in the family.”

(Source: The Guardian)