Friday, 10 February 2017

How did Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Malayalam arise from one Dravidian language family?

Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam and Tamil are related languages belonging to one Dravidian family. Together with another 20 languages, they have evolved from a common ancestral language labeled as Proto-Dravidian.

Early Indians were the aboriginal tribes, who spoke various Austro-Asiatic languages. They were the original hunter-gatherers of Southern India, who were assimilated into the mainstream population. These people have left their foot prints among all South Indian languages.

All Dravidian languages still share a common word for hunting derived from Veddah tribe (veta in Telugu). South India was populated by several such Austro-Asiatic tribes. Many of our words for flora and fauna have Austro-Asiatic origins
Veddahs with their primitive weapons. Once their ancestors have populated the entire southern India. 

New Immigrants to Southern India
Around 2,500 BCE, these Austro-Asiatic people were gradually displaced by a new culture. Unlike the hunter-gatherers, these new comers were semi-nomads and animal herders, probably cultivated jowar, ragi, bajra like millets as well.

Their earliest pottery and ground axes in South India date to 3,000 BCE. There is archaeo-botanical evidence for cultivation, from 2,200 BCE, while they probably domesticated cattle, sheep and goats before 2,600 BCE.

Ash Mound Culture
These semi-nomads have created their own unique culture, called the Ash Mound culture. A particularly distinctive aspect of this ancient culture are “ashmound” sites which consist of large heaped accumulations of ash and vitrified material, which are now generally accepted as having originated from burnt cattle dung.

The petroglyphs are works of rock art found in Anantapur, Kurnool of AP and Bellary districts of Karnataka, India. Thousands of petroglyphs have been found, which date to the neolithic or even the old stone age.
Rock paintings at Ketavaram hill range in Kurnool district (AP),

Ancestors to Ash Mound people spoke a common language labeled as Proto-Dravidian. These ancestors came to South India as a small band of nomads and initially settled along lower Godavari basin. The river name itself has Dravidian origins.

The lower Godavari Dravidian Home land hypothesis was originally proposed by Prof. F C Southworth (University of Pennsylvania). The Dravidian homeland is assumed to be the region with a maximum diversity of Dravidian languages. Because both in genetics as well as linguistics, geographical region with maximum diversity is assumed to be the origin. The rationale is based on the dynamics of population

The red outlined region (above) has the maximum diversity of Dravidian languages and hence it is the most probable origin of Proto-Dravidian language. Please read, Urheimat - Wikipedia. Oldest languages are closest to lower Godavari basin, around the red outlined region.

Now there is independent confirmation from genetic evidence. There is a high frequency of rare Haplogroup-T in coastal Andhra as well as the Horn-of-Africa. This rare haplogroup-T is associated with the neolithic farmers of Mesopotamia. For details please read, Genetics and the Afro-Dravidian Hypothesis

Geographical Expansion
As the population increased, proto-Dravidians began to expand into the neighboring regions. Ancient migrations are known to take place along the river routes because the rivers were the source of livelihood for these semi-nomads, so they expanded progressively and settled along river banks of Godavari, Krishna, Tungabadra and Kaveri and spread out into farthest corners of Southern India . Others have expanded upstream Godavari into Maharashtra and further into Gujarat.
Zdenek Burian: A neolithic settlement

Those who settled along lower Krishna basin became the ancestors to TELUGU speakers. Next, those who expanded westwards along the upper Krishna and Tungabadra into Karnataka became the ancestors to KANNADA speakers. Those who expanded further west became MALAYALAM speakers and finally those who expanded along the Kaveri river became the ancestors to TAMILS.
Dravidian migration along the river routes from Andhra to Karnataka to Kerala and finally Tamil Nadu
As they expanded, they got geographically isolated from each other and came into contact Austro-Asiatic tribes. Their languages evolved into different dialects that ultimately became distinct languages.

Proto-Dravidian speakers first settled along the lower Godavari basin, next they further expanded along the river routes of Krishna, Tungabadra and Kaveri, gradually displacing the aboriginal Austro-Asiatic tribes. TELUGU ancestors settled along the lower Krishna basin to emerge as a distinct language. Others have further expanded along upper Krishna into Karnataka, westwards to reach Kerala, then southwards along the Kaveri to reach Tamil Nadu. Isolated from each others by mountain ranges and forests, KANNADA, MALAYALAM and TAMIL became distinct languages. Lower Godavari homeland is genetically associated with the Neolitihic farmers from Mesopotamia, as found from the high occurrence of Y-DNA haplogroup-T in coastal Andhra.

  1. Please see page-15 of
  2. Evidence Regarding Dravidian Linguistic Origins
  3. Genetics and the Afro-Dravidian Hypothesis
  4. Franklin C. Southworth, David W. McAlpin. "South Asia: Dravidian linguistic history". Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2013.
Many of the comments posted below seem to be skeptical about the external origins of Dravidians. This is quite understandable because, since the 19th century it is believed that Dravidians were native to India, while the Indo-Aryans supposedly came from outside. This was the very basis for the assumption that Indus Valley Civilization was Dravidian.

However, for a long time, evidence is mounting indicating the external origins of Dravidians. First, a setback to Dravidan Hypothesis came when it failed to decipher the Indus Valley Script. Next, conclusive evidence came from the craniometry measurements of human skulls from Indus Valley. It proved that Indus Valley people were similar to the existing populations of Haryana and Punjab, not the Dravidians of south. This is a categorical and positive evidence against the Dravidian hypothesis.

If the Dravidians were not IVC people, then who were they? How does one account for the presence of Haplogroups ‘L-M20’ and ‘T’ that spread with the ancient neolithic farmers of Mesopotatmia? How does one account for the cultivation of African pearl millet in the Deccan plateau? There are many other linguistic and cultural features that indicate the external origins of Dravidians.

(Source: Quora)

No comments:

Post a Comment